Publications Ethic

Journal of Islamic Banking and Finance Science published twice a year in print and online by the Islamic Banking Study Program, Faculty of Economics and Islamic Business, UIN Datokrama Palu. This statement describes the ethical behavior of all parties involved in publishing articles in the Journal of Islamic Banking and Finance Science, including authors, editorial board, bestarial partners, and publishers. This statement is based on COPEs Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Publication Ethics Guidelines
The publication of articles in the Journal of Islamic Banking and Finance Science is a chain system of scientific development in the field of Islamic banking and finance studies. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. The articles reviewed support and contain the scientific method. Therefore, it is important to agree on the standards of ethical behavior expected for all parties involved in publishing, viz: authors, journal editors, reviewers, publishers, and the public.
The Islamic Banking Study Program, Faculty of Economics and Islamic Business UIN Datokarama Palu as the publisher of the Journal of Islamic Banking and Finance Science is responsible for overseeing all stages of publication in earnest and recognizes ethical and other responsibilities. The institution is committed to assisting communication with journal managers and/or other publishers if deemed useful and necessary.

Publication Decisions
The editor of the Journal of Islamic Banking and Finance Science is responsible for deciding which of the submitted articles should be published. The validity of the work and its importance to researchers and readers should always drive the decision. Editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by legal requirements as they apply to defamation, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. Editors may confer with other editors or the review team in making these decisions.

Fair Treatment
The editors always assess manuscripts on the basis of their intellectual content without regard to the race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, nationality or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality
Editors and editorial staff should not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the authors, expert editors, reviewers, and publisher.

Notification and Conflict of Interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in the submitted manuscript may not be used in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists editors in making editorial decisions and, through editorial communication with authors, can also help authors improve their manuscripts.

Promptness
Any selected reviewer who feels unqualified to assess the research reported in a manuscript or knows that prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself or herself from the review process.

Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Without the editor's permission, you cannot show them to or discuss them with others.

Objectivity Standards
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is not acceptable. Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgment of Sources
Reviewers should point out relevant published works that the author has not cited. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument has been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also bring to the editor's attention any similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Notification and Conflict of Interest
Information or opinions obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions associated with the paper.

Duties of Authors

Article Standards
Authors must present accurate articles about their original work and an objective discussion of its significance. Fundamental data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements are unethical and unacceptable.

Originality and plagiarism
Authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works and cited them appropriately when using others' work and/or words.

Duplicate, redundant, or concurrent publication
An author should generally not publish a manuscript describing essentially the same research in more than one major journal or publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal simultaneously is unethical and unacceptable behavior. The editor of Jurnal Ilmu Perbankan dan Keuangan Syariah reserves the right to revoke, retract and cancel publications that are indicated to be double/repeat publications.

Acknowledgment of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of others' work must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the work reported.

Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made significant contributions to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. If there are others who participated in certain substantial aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Errors in Published Works
If an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in their published work, it is their obligation to promptly notify the editor or journal publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.